The General Known About Framing Analysis

Framing analysis is an alternative model of analysis that can uncover the secrets behind a difference even opposition media in revealing the facts. Framing analysis is used to determine how reality is framed by the media. Thus social reality is understood, interpreted, and constructed with the formation and specific meaning. These elements are not only the technical part of journalism, but rather indicates how events are interpreted and displayed. This is indeed a political reality, how media construct, deliver, maintain, and reproduce, an event to the reader. Through analysis of the framing will be known who controling who, who who the opponent, where comrades where the opponent, where patrons and where the client, who is helped and who hurt, who oppresses and who is oppressed, and so on. Such conclusions are very likely obtained because the analysis is an art-framing of creativity that has the freedom to interpret reality by using certain theories and methodologies. There are two main essence of framing analysis is, first, how events are interpreted. This relates to the part covered and what is not covered. Second, how the written facts. This aspect relates to the use of words, sentences, and pictures to support the idea.

    FRAMING ANALYSIS OF HISTORICAL ROOTS.

Analysis of the framing is the latest version of discourse analysis approach, particularly for analyzing media texts. The idea of ​​framing, first raised by Beterson in 1955. At first, the frame is defined as a conceptual structure or set of beliefs that organize political views, policies, and discourse, as well as providing standard  categories to appreciate reality. However, later evolving understanding framing is interpreted to describe the selection process and highlighting specific aspects of a reality by the media. In the realm of communication studies, framing analysis represent a tradition that emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach or perspective to analyze the phenomenon of communication or activity.
Framing analysis as a media content analysis method, is relatively new. It develops mainly thanks to the views of constructionism. This paradigm has its own position and views of the news media and the resulting text. The concept of constructionism was introduced by interpretive sociologists, Peter L. Beger with Thomas Luckman, who wrote a thesis on the work and produce and the social construction of reality. Berger utamadari thesis is the product of man and society is dialectical, dynamic, and continuously plural. For Berger, the reality was not established scientifically derived not also something of God, but he formed and reconstructed. With such an understanding, the double-faced reality / plural. Everyone can have a different construction upon a reality. Besides plural, socially constructed also be dynamic. As a result of the social construction of reality can be a subjective reality and objective reality. Subjective reality, concerning the meaning, interpretation, and the results of the relationships between individual objects. While the objective reality, is something experienced, external, outside or in terms of Berger, we can not Disable with wishful thinking.
News in view of social construction, not an event or fact in the real sense. Here, reality is not just passed off as news. He is a product of interaction between journalists with facts. In the process of internalization journalist hit by reality. Reality observed by journalists and reporters absorbed in consciousness. In the process externalization, journalist threw himself to interpret reality. Conception of the facts expressed to see reality. Results of the news is the product of the interaction process and dialectic.